In a recent development, the NBA has decided to credit Ben Simmons for the 2021-22 season, even though the player did not participate in any games during that time. The decision comes as part of the league’s new collective bargaining agreement, and it has sparked debates among officials and teams.
According to a report by Zach Lowe of ESPN, a side letter attached to the new CBA indicated that Simmons would receive credit for the season when he held out from the 76ers and was eventually traded to the Nets. This credit grants Simmons an additional year of service in the NBA, bringing his total to seven official years.
The number of years of service holds significance in determining a player’s eligibility for various benefits, including maximum contracts of certain sizes. Consequently, several teams’ officials had contested Simmons’ eligibility for this season’s credit. However, the side letter remains applicable solely to Simmons and does not establish a precedent for future cases.
The decision to credit Simmons for a season in which he did not play has sparked discussions among fans and experts alike. It raises questions about the impact on his contract negotiations and potential implications for other players in similar situations.
The 2021-22 season was a turbulent one for Simmons, marked by his public dispute with the 76ers and trade demand. Despite being under contract with the team, Simmons made it clear that he no longer wanted to be part of the roster. This resulted in missed practices, fines, and suspension.
After his trade to the Nets, Simmons encountered further setbacks due to a herniated disk in his back, ultimately leading to his decision to undergo surgery.
The NBA’s decision to credit Simmons for the 2021-22 season adds another layer of complexity to his career trajectory and raises questions about the league’s approach to such situations in the future.
