Photo: Peter Baba

The NBA continues to grapple with a significant imbalance in the quality of teams between the Western and Eastern Conferences. As the league gears up for potential expansion in the coming years, Seattle and Las Vegas have emerged as the frontrunners for new franchises.

With the expansion, the NBA will likely need to realign its conferences, potentially moving one of the Minnesota Timberwolves, Memphis Grizzlies, or New Orleans Pelicans to the Eastern Conference to restore balance.

However, some within the league are advocating for a more radical restructuring: eliminating the conference format and adopting a playoff system that allows the top 16 teams, regardless of geography, to qualify. This idea has been floated in the past and is gaining renewed traction.

“It would be the right thing to do for the health of the league,” one Western Conference general manager commented. “It’s not just about fairness; it’s about giving the fans the best playoff product.”

Such a move would require approval from at least 23 of the 30 NBA teams, representing more than 75 percent of the league. This presents a challenge, as it would mean convincing at least eight of the 15 Eastern Conference team owners to vote against their own interests.

Many Eastern teams benefit from the current structure, which often allows lower-seeded teams from the East to secure playoff spots over stronger teams from the West.

While the idea of eliminating conferences could enhance the competitive integrity of the playoffs and improve the overall fan experience, the path to implementation would require navigating complex negotiations and securing broad consensus among team owners.

As expansion looms, the league faces pivotal decisions that could reshape its structure for years to come.