Posts: 66
Threads: 4
Joined: Mar 2009
Reputation:
0
I noticed that Zalgiris has A-License to the Euroleague for the next 3 season's, while Rytas need to win the LKL or the Eurocup to qualify to the Euroleague. most of the A-License's are reasnoable (even tough they are not sportive) - most of the A-License teams are more established, strong and has more sportive sucsses than other teams in their country. but in Lithuania it isn't so, both Zalgiris and Rytas financial situation is "shaky", both have based attendence, both teams have equal sucsses in the Euroleague in the last years (top16 level most of the season's), and most importantly there is no big diffrence between Rytas and Zalgiris sucsses in the LKL and Baltic league (Zalgiris is little bit more sucssesfull).
Even if there is a diffrence between Zalgiris and Rytas, the diffrence isn't so big that Zalgiris has to get the automatic qualification to the Euroleague over Rytas. I think that ULEB should cancel Zalgiris A-License and put the LKL champion and finalist high in the B-License ranking, alternatively ULEB can give both Rytas and Zalgiris A-License.
BTW, a nice overview over Euroleague new qualification system.
Posts: 3,778
Threads: 476
Joined: Mar 2006
Reputation:
0
If we look for an explanation why A license was given to Zalgiris we should remember few things. First of all Zalgiris is the most famous Lithuanian basketball team. They won Euroleague in 1999. When ULEB was founded and there was a conflict in European basketball they supported ULEB while Rytas played in FIBA's Suproleague. Zalgiris attracts more TV viewers. And I guess they attract more people in other countries. I think that Euroleague has in mind all those things.
Finances of Rytas were more secure this season. They lost only two players and there were no problems of paying wages to players. The fact is that their management is more modern than Zalgiris.
Rytas did a massive job in such short history and they are proving they deserve to be in Euroleague every year. I totally agree with that and I've been saying that for a few years. However, Rytas didn't manage to win enough LKL titles to qualify for Euroleague and Zalgiris remains more successful here.
Zalgiris had good relationships with Euroleague. So I wouldn't rule out that it had some influence when making a decision. Though the club's management did a poor job and deserve some kind of "punishment".
Lithuania should have 2 guaranteed EL places and that's all.
Posts: 5,110
Threads: 590
Joined: Dec 2006
Reputation:
0
Supports: Panathinaikos
Zalgiris isn't established in Lithuania? Zalgiris is establishment itself in Lithuania.
Besides, this license is based on the teams' sportive results, and so far Zalgiris is doing a much better job.
Respect and thanks for everything:
Alvertis, Bodiroga, Jasikevicius, Radja, Wilkins, Vrankovic, Fotsis, Rebraca, Kattash, Gentile, Koch, Middleton, Kutluay, Rogers, Papadopoulos, Becirovic, Tomasevic, Siskauskas, Pekovic, Lakovic, Vujanic, Chatzivrettas, Maljkovic, Spanoulis and many more to follow in the near future.
Posts: 5,110
Threads: 590
Joined: Dec 2006
Reputation:
0
Supports: Panathinaikos
gambit Zalgiris 84-76 Rytas tonight You were saying?
Respect and thanks for everything:
Alvertis, Bodiroga, Jasikevicius, Radja, Wilkins, Vrankovic, Fotsis, Rebraca, Kattash, Gentile, Koch, Middleton, Kutluay, Rogers, Papadopoulos, Becirovic, Tomasevic, Siskauskas, Pekovic, Lakovic, Vujanic, Chatzivrettas, Maljkovic, Spanoulis and many more to follow in the near future.
Posts: 66
Threads: 4
Joined: Mar 2009
Reputation:
0
Apr 8, 2009, 10:40 pm
(This post was last modified: Mar 6, 2010, 1:06 pm by TalkBasket.)
let's wait until the end of the playoff's
|